Fwd: [OTR-users] OTR use in email

[CLAY SHENTRUP]

There can't be really.  The sender and receiver have to agree upon a shared
secret at the time of transmition, which requires at least 3 passes.

On 1/10/06, Daniel Guido <dguido at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Correct me if I'm wrong, but there is no working implementation of OTR for
> e-mail yet is there?
>
> If one wanted to have anonymous, confidential communication via e-mail,
> what would you use?  Note the anonymous part, I don't believe PGP will
> satisfy me.  Options like hushmail and s-mail are also not options at all,
> as they're the same as a single hop proxy.  What do you reccommend?
> --
> Dan Guido



--
Here's an idea that would save the world:  I think, we should get some large
magnetic rings and attach wires to them such that one wire is attached to
each of a set of two magnetic rings in opposing polarity. Then, we should
dig up everyone that was a great thinker of the enlightenment and dip them
in molten iron. After that, following Maxwell's famous equations, we'll just
tell that girl and all the other stupids that we prayed for it to happen and
jebus made it work, we'll put all of our iron covered thinkers of the
enlightenment back in their graves inside the magnetic rings. Once there,
the combined speed with which they turn will be enough to ween us off fossil
fuels.

—NATE OBORNY, TALKING ABOUT A GIRL WHO DOESN'T BELIEVE IN GLOBAL WARMING
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cypherpunks.ca/pipermail/otr-users/attachments/20060110/ef6acbdd/attachment.html>