[OTR-dev] Attention OTR packagers: provide RC1 feedback by the end of Monday

[Chris Ballinger]

Should this be compiled against libgcrypt 1.6 or 1.5.x?

On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 8:50 AM, Ian Goldberg <ian at cypherpunks.ca> wrote:

> On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 11:13:46AM +0200, intrigeri wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Greg Troxel wrote (15 Oct 2014 17:49:09 GMT) :
> > > That sounds fine, except that packaging systems will want to start with
> > > a release tarball and update the pkg and see if it is all ok, which
> then
> > > can lead to a respin.   So I'd suggest putting up a 'make dist' draft
> > > output as early as is sane to let that process get going.
> >
> > A RC1 would be good too, but as far as I'm concerned, it's not
> > strictly needed, as long as there's time to
> > prepare/release/package/uploade a point-release to fix serious issues
> > identified in the initial release.
>
> Fair enough.  Here are the release candidate 1 tarballs:
>
> https://otr.cypherpunks.ca/libotr-4.1.0-rc1.tar.gz
> https://otr.cypherpunks.ca/pidgin-otr-4.0.1-rc1.tar.gz
>
> All packagers: please try these out and post here by the end of Monday
> (20 Oct) whether or not something is amiss.
>
> Paul in particular: the above tarballs still contain the 4.0.0 spec
> files.  Please send me ones for the new versions if you want them
> included in the release.
>
> I will next try to build the Windows binaries.  I've never tried that on
> this new machine, so hopefully the instructions in the repo haven't
> bitrotted too badly... :-p
>
> Thanks, all!
>
>    - Ian
> _______________________________________________
> OTR-dev mailing list
> OTR-dev at lists.cypherpunks.ca
> http://lists.cypherpunks.ca/mailman/listinfo/otr-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cypherpunks.ca/pipermail/otr-dev/attachments/20141019/11165963/attachment.html>