[OTR-dev] 4.0.0-rc3 ready to roll. Please try it out!

[Ian Goldberg]

On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 01:08:12AM +0200, Thibaut VARENE wrote:
> Quick silly question:
> 
> should it be packaged as "libotr3", being protocol v3 (which was
> apparently in line with what was done for 3.x), or "libotr5", being
> sonumber 5 (which is what distros recommend)?

libotr5, libotr5-bin, libotr5-dev.  The previous package name was
libotr2, because the .so major number was 2.

Thanks,

   - Ian