[OTR-dev] Attention OTR packagers: provide RC1 feedback by the end of Monday

[David Goulet]

On 20 Oct (09:51:37), Ian Goldberg wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 04:23:08PM -0700, Chris Ballinger wrote:
> > Should this be compiled against libgcrypt 1.6 or 1.5.x?
> 
> I've been using 1.5.x, since that's what's on my Ubuntu.  I'd love to
> know whether something goes amiss with 1.6, though.

libgcrypt 1.6+ works fine with the new test suite btw except for *one*
single unit test where I had a bit of time to investiguate why but not
fixed yet upstream or in the test suite (depending on the needed fix).

For now, I don't think it affects libotr security or functionalities and
should not stop anyone using 1.6+.

Cheers!
David

> 
>    - Ian
> _______________________________________________
> OTR-dev mailing list
> OTR-dev at lists.cypherpunks.ca
> http://lists.cypherpunks.ca/mailman/listinfo/otr-dev
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 603 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.cypherpunks.ca/pipermail/otr-dev/attachments/20141020/ace27f45/attachment.pgp>