[OTR-dev] Fragmentation

Hannes Mehnert hannes at mehnert.org
Wed Dec 17 18:01:02 EST 2014


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA384

On 12/17/2014 18:22, Ian Goldberg wrote:
> Hmm.  That certainly isn't the *intent*.  I don't see in the spec
> where it allows fragments to be fragmented.  Messages can be
> fragmented, but fragments aren't messages--they're fragments of
> messages.

right.

> Can you point to where the spec misled you or was unclear?  I'd 
> certainly like to fix that.

Re-reading it turns out the spec is pretty clear, and talks about
'messages, either fragmented or unfragmented', in the fragmentation
section about 'fragments'.
It wouldn't hurt too much to explicitly state 'messages can be
fragmented, fragments can't - they aren't messages' in the
fragmentation section.


sorry for the noise (and my parser isn't recursive anymore since this
morning),

hannes
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=kCQb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


More information about the OTR-dev mailing list