[OTR-dev] otr against gaim-cvs

Andrew Rodland arodland at entermail.net
Sat Nov 19 03:25:47 EST 2005

On Thursday 17 November 2005 08:46 am, Ian Goldberg wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 03:38:09AM -0500, Andrew Rodland wrote:
> > Is there a tree anywhere that's tracking the changes going into gaim
> > (pre-2.0) CVS, or are the devs waiting for things to settle down first?
> > I'm tracking gaim-cvs, so if there's an otr-cvs, I'm willing to keep on
> > it and find out when and how it breaks :)
> Someone's sent in a patch, which we'll look at when we get a chance (at
> the end of the month).  We'll probably stick it in CVS if it looks
> plausible, and then you'll be able to let us know what breaks.  ;-)
> Ah, whatever.  Here's the patch that was sent in (only briefly looked
> at by me).  Have at it, and let us know... ;-)

I've been using this for a few days, and it looks pretty good. I've had one 
segfault that appeared to be OTR-related, but it disappeared before I could 
get a backtrace on it, so I don't have any idea whether it's related to 
gaim-cvs or not. Everything else seems to be pretty good, though; no protocol 
problems (not that I expected any), and the UI and gaim integration are just 


More information about the OTR-dev mailing list