[OTR-dev] Hmmm.
Greg Troxel
gdt at ir.bbn.com
Tue Jan 25 19:35:52 EST 2005
If you can leave the old function and add a new one, you don't have to
bump major. But if it's a callback that's really annoying.
While I'm fussy about shlib versions, I don't see that the libotr
version has to follow the shlib version. But I also don't see the
harm.
Waiting to batch changes is quite sane, too. In src/libc in NetBSD
source tree there is a big list (12 things?) of things to change on
next major bump. This would be a good prod to review the whole API
for any other issues.
[In other news, I just got a AM_PATH_LIBOTR autoconf macro working,
and the proxy is now autoconfiscated and using it. :-) ]
Cool. I was going to make up a libotr.pc.in file so that we could use
pkg-config to find libotr. Basically pkg-config abstracts what you
want in something like AM_PATH_LIBOTR, providing generic code and a
data file.
--
Greg Troxel <gdt at ir.bbn.com>
More information about the OTR-dev
mailing list