From ian@cypherpunks.ca Mon Sep 5 18:41:26 2005 From: ian@cypherpunks.ca (Ian Goldberg) Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2005 13:41:26 -0400 Subject: [OTR-users] GAIM OTR plugin problems In-Reply-To: <20050805081243.GA25009@henkis.net> References: <20050805081243.GA25009@henkis.net> Message-ID: <20050905174126.GH13525@smtp.paip.net> On Fri, Aug 05, 2005 at 10:12:43AM +0200, wine@henkis.net wrote: > Any suggestions? Debuging tips? If you run "gaim -d", it should tell you what library you're missing. Are you sure you've got your dependencies right? Check in particular that you've got libgcrypt 1.2.x (/usr/lib/libgcrypt.so.11.1.x). - Ian From wine@henkis.net Wed Sep 14 09:45:53 2005 From: wine@henkis.net (wine@henkis.net) Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 10:45:53 +0200 Subject: [OTR-users] GAIM OTR plugin problems In-Reply-To: <20050905174126.GH13525@smtp.paip.net> References: <20050805081243.GA25009@henkis.net> <20050905174126.GH13525@smtp.paip.net> Message-ID: <20050914084553.GA25844@henkis.net> Thanks! I Was missing libusb from the LD_LIBRARY_PATH: plugins: probing /opt/sfw/lib/gaim/gaim-otr.so plugins: /opt/sfw/lib/gaim/gaim-otr.so is unloadable: ld.so.1: gaim: fatal: libucb.so.1: open failed: No such file or directory But if i include it in the LD_LIBRARY_PATH gaim crashes: (It worked so far that i was able to select the plugin in preferences, but after that it crashes at startup) $ mdb /opt/sfw/bin/gaim core Loading modules: [ libc.so.1 libuutil.so.1 ld.so.1 ] > $C 080463a4 libc.so.1`_lwp_kill+0x15(1, 6) 080463bc libc.so.1`raise+0x1f(6) 08046404 libc.so.1`abort+0xcd(8046470, ced52000, cefe8000, 804642c, cefa27ef, b ) 08046418 sighandler+0x4b(b, 0, 80464c4) 0804642c libc.so.1`__sighndlr+0xf(b, 0, 80464c4, 8132a48) 0804648c libc.so.1`call_user_handler+0x22b(b, 0, 80464c4) 080464b0 libc.so.1`sigacthandler+0xbc(b, 0, 80464c4) 08046790 libgcrypt.so.1.5.1`_gcry_mpi_normalize+0x1a(820bd0c, 820bd10, 822cbb0) 0804687c libotr.so.1.0.2`otrl_privkey_read+0x748(81d6ad0, 822c338) 080468b4 gaim-otr.so`otr_plugin_load+0xe4(8208b50) 08046ce0 gaim_plugin_load+0x2fd(8208b50) 08046d0c gaim_plugins_load_saved+0x131(815d5a4) 0804721c main+0xb25(1, 8047244, 804724c) 08047238 _start+0x7a(1, 8047388, 0, 804738d, 80473a1, 80473d5) On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 01:41:26PM -0400, Ian Goldberg wrote: > On Fri, Aug 05, 2005 at 10:12:43AM +0200, wine@henkis.net wrote: > > Any suggestions? Debuging tips? > > If you run "gaim -d", it should tell you what library you're missing. > Are you sure you've got your dependencies right? Check in particular > that you've got libgcrypt 1.2.x (/usr/lib/libgcrypt.so.11.1.x). > > - Ian > _______________________________________________ > OTR-users mailing list > OTR-users@lists.cypherpunks.ca > http://lists.cypherpunks.ca/mailman/listinfo/otr-users From ian@cypherpunks.ca Wed Sep 14 13:19:49 2005 From: ian@cypherpunks.ca (Ian Goldberg) Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 08:19:49 -0400 Subject: [OTR-users] GAIM OTR plugin problems In-Reply-To: <20050914084553.GA25844@henkis.net> References: <20050805081243.GA25009@henkis.net> <20050905174126.GH13525@smtp.paip.net> <20050914084553.GA25844@henkis.net> Message-ID: <20050914121949.GO5658@smtp.paip.net> On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 10:45:53AM +0200, wine@henkis.net wrote: > Thanks! > > I Was missing libusb from the LD_LIBRARY_PATH: > plugins: probing /opt/sfw/lib/gaim/gaim-otr.so > plugins: /opt/sfw/lib/gaim/gaim-otr.so is unloadable: ld.so.1: gaim: fatal: libucb.so.1: open failed: No such file or directory > > But if i include it in the LD_LIBRARY_PATH gaim crashes: > (It worked so far that i was able to select the plugin in preferences, but > after that it crashes at startup) > > $ mdb /opt/sfw/bin/gaim core > Loading modules: [ libc.so.1 libuutil.so.1 ld.so.1 ] > > $C > 080463a4 libc.so.1`_lwp_kill+0x15(1, 6) > 080463bc libc.so.1`raise+0x1f(6) > 08046404 libc.so.1`abort+0xcd(8046470, ced52000, cefe8000, 804642c, cefa27ef, b > ) > 08046418 sighandler+0x4b(b, 0, 80464c4) > 0804642c libc.so.1`__sighndlr+0xf(b, 0, 80464c4, 8132a48) > 0804648c libc.so.1`call_user_handler+0x22b(b, 0, 80464c4) > 080464b0 libc.so.1`sigacthandler+0xbc(b, 0, 80464c4) ^ You got a SIGSEGV ----------------------| > 08046790 libgcrypt.so.1.5.1`_gcry_mpi_normalize+0x1a(820bd0c, 820bd10, 822cbb0) ^ ^ In this function --+-----------| | In this library ---| which seems to be the wrong one. libgcrypt.so.1.5.1 is from libgcrypt-1.1.5. You should be linking to libgcrypt.so.11.1.x, which is the library from libgcrypt-1.2.x. Can you check into how this happened? libotr's configure script should be checking for the right version of libgcrypt. Thanks, - Ian > On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 01:41:26PM -0400, Ian Goldberg wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 05, 2005 at 10:12:43AM +0200, wine@henkis.net wrote: > > > Any suggestions? Debuging tips? > > > > If you run "gaim -d", it should tell you what library you're missing. > > Are you sure you've got your dependencies right? Check in particular > > that you've got libgcrypt 1.2.x (/usr/lib/libgcrypt.so.11.1.x). > > > > - Ian From billrrichter@yahoo.com Thu Sep 15 21:40:07 2005 From: billrrichter@yahoo.com (William Richter) Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 13:40:07 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [OTR-users] google talk Message-ID: <20050915204007.23596.qmail@web31714.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Is OTR compatible with win2k and google talk? thanks. Bill Richter Diagnostic Specialist/ Information Systems Manager San Jose CA. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From ian@cypherpunks.ca Thu Sep 15 22:32:03 2005 From: ian@cypherpunks.ca (Ian Goldberg) Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 17:32:03 -0400 Subject: [OTR-users] google talk In-Reply-To: <20050915204007.23596.qmail@web31714.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <20050915204007.23596.qmail@web31714.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <20050915213203.GW5658@smtp.paip.net> On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 01:40:07PM -0700, William Richter wrote: > Is OTR compatible with win2k and google talk? I imagine (though no one has told me for sure) that gaim-otr should work just fine on Google's Jabber server. Google's native client has no OTR support, though, and there's not yet an OTR proxy for the Jabber protocol. - Ian From paul@cypherpunks.ca Fri Sep 16 02:29:33 2005 From: paul@cypherpunks.ca (Paul Wouters) Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 03:29:33 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [OTR-users] google talk In-Reply-To: <20050915213203.GW5658@smtp.paip.net> References: <20050915204007.23596.qmail@web31714.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <20050915213203.GW5658@smtp.paip.net> Message-ID: On Thu, 15 Sep 2005, Ian Goldberg wrote: > On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 01:40:07PM -0700, William Richter wrote: >> Is OTR compatible with win2k and google talk? > > I imagine (though no one has told me for sure) that gaim-otr should work > just fine on Google's Jabber server. Google's native client has no OTR > support, though, and there's not yet an OTR proxy for the Jabber > protocol. I still have not been able to login to google's talk server. I am using gaim, and followed the instructions on: http://www.google.com/support/talk/bin/answer.py?answer=24073 I can login to my gmail account fine, but the talk server does not like me. So, I have therefor not been able to actually test OTR over their server. Paul From Nikita Borisov Fri Sep 16 03:50:14 2005 From: Nikita Borisov (Nikita Borisov) Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 21:50:14 -0500 Subject: Fwd: [OTR-users] google talk In-Reply-To: <16f0378d05091519493484e122@mail.gmail.com> References: <20050915204007.23596.qmail@web31714.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <20050915213203.GW5658@smtp.paip.net> <16f0378d05091519493484e122@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <16f0378d0509151950162e9111@mail.gmail.com> On 9/15/05, Paul Wouters wrote: > > I imagine (though no one has told me for sure) that gaim-otr should work > > just fine on Google's Jabber server. Google's native client has no OTR > > support, though, and there's not yet an OTR proxy for the Jabber > > protocol. > > I still have not been able to login to google's talk server. I am using > gaim, and followed the instructions on: > > http://www.google.com/support/talk/bin/answer.py?answer=24073 > > I can login to my gmail account fine, but the talk server does not like me. > So, I have therefor not been able to actually test OTR over their server. I haven't had any problems logging into the talk server with Adium. I've just tried running OTR over their server and it works with two Adium clients. - Nikita From codewarrior@cuseeme.de Fri Sep 16 14:04:56 2005 From: codewarrior@cuseeme.de (codewarrior@cuseeme.de) Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 15:04:56 +0200 Subject: [OTR-users] google talk In-Reply-To: <16f0378d0509151950162e9111@mail.gmail.com> References: <20050915204007.23596.qmail@web31714.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <20050915213203.GW5658@smtp.paip.net> <16f0378d05091519493484e122@mail.gmail.com> <16f0378d0509151950162e9111@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <9F89615F-7332-4E49-A2C6-61962ED09EEE@cuseeme.de> On Sep 16, 2005, at 4:50 AM, Nikita Borisov wrote: > On 9/15/05, Paul Wouters wrote: > >>> I imagine (though no one has told me for sure) that gaim-otr >>> should work >>> just fine on Google's Jabber server. Google's native client has >>> no OTR >>> support, though, and there's not yet an OTR proxy for the Jabber >>> protocol. >>> >> >> I still have not been able to login to google's talk server. I am >> using >> gaim, and followed the instructions on: >> >> http://www.google.com/support/talk/bin/answer.py?answer=24073 >> >> I can login to my gmail account fine, but the talk server does not >> like me. >> So, I have therefor not been able to actually test OTR over their >> server. >> > > I haven't had any problems logging into the talk server with Adium. > I've just tried running OTR over their server and it works with two > Adium clients. just donīt use it google talk is just another BIGBROTHER. http://www.google-watch.org/bigbro.html check it for yourself http://www.google.com/search?client=safari&rls=en&q=big+brother +google&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8 cheers > > - Nikita > > _______________________________________________ > OTR-users mailing list > OTR-users@lists.cypherpunks.ca > http://lists.cypherpunks.ca/mailman/listinfo/otr-users > > From gmaxwell@gmail.com Fri Sep 16 14:25:08 2005 From: gmaxwell@gmail.com (Gregory Maxwell) Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 09:25:08 -0400 Subject: [OTR-users] google talk In-Reply-To: <9F89615F-7332-4E49-A2C6-61962ED09EEE@cuseeme.de> References: <20050915204007.23596.qmail@web31714.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <20050915213203.GW5658@smtp.paip.net> <16f0378d05091519493484e122@mail.gmail.com> <16f0378d0509151950162e9111@mail.gmail.com> <9F89615F-7332-4E49-A2C6-61962ED09EEE@cuseeme.de> Message-ID: On 9/16/05, codewarrior@cuseeme.de wrote: > just donīt use it google talk is just another BIGBROTHER. > http://www.google-watch.org/bigbro.html > > check it for yourself If you're concerned that google talk represents an increase in privacy loss, perhaps you could start trying to organize a public call for google-talk to include OTR and enable it by default? A rejection of such a request would certainly be good fodder for the google is evil camp. :) and if they accept, the better for everyone.