Hi,<br><br>It is 'End-to-End Encrypted Group Messaging with Insider Security' by Nik Unger. (ref is OTR17). Referring to it as DAKEZ was inaccurate, but it was from memory.<br><br>Regards<br><br>-------- Original Message --------<br>On Feb 18, 2023, 12:37 PM, ROOT@HardenedVault < root@hardenedvault.net> wrote:<blockquote class="protonmail_quote"><br>Hi Danny,
Which paper? I remember that the DAKEZ paper only referred to OTRv3, and suggested DAKEZ to resolve its disadvantage. OTRv4 proposal includes a modified DAKEZ protocol.
regards
R@HardenedVault
------- Original Message -------
On Saturday, February 18th, 2023 at 12:11 AM, Danny van Heumen <danny@dannyvanheumen.nl> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can anyone tell me what the status is of the OTRv4 spec?
>
> I tried asking <https://github.com/otrv4/otrv4/issues/230> but have not had any response yet. I noticed that the DAKEZ paper does reference OTRv4's use, but IIRC it refers to it as in-development.
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Danny</div>