From paul at cypherpunks.ca Sat Dec 4 18:33:38 2010 From: paul at cypherpunks.ca (Paul Wouters) Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2010 18:33:38 -0500 (EST) Subject: [OTR-dev] [OTR-users] New OTR Development In-Reply-To: <1290108243.4487.57.camel@scspc293.cs> References: <1290108243.4487.57.camel@scspc293.cs> Message-ID: On Thu, 18 Nov 2010, Rob Smits wrote: > Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 14:24:03 -0500 > From: Rob Smits > Cc: otr-users at lists.cypherpunks.ca > To: otr-dev at lists.cypherpunks.ca > Subject: [OTR-users] New OTR Development > > [Please note that while I have included both the dev and users lists in > this message, only send your replies to the dev list] Please take a look at the git repository we made for last year's GSoC project. It has a lot of patches merged in already. (on gsoc.xelerance.com) The resource conflict is really an important fix to get out. Ideally before an entire redesign.... Paul From paul at cypherpunks.ca Sat Dec 4 18:35:06 2010 From: paul at cypherpunks.ca (Paul Wouters) Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2010 18:35:06 -0500 (EST) Subject: [OTR-dev] New OTR Development In-Reply-To: <4CE5838D.8000908@stpeter.im> References: <1290108243.4487.57.camel@scspc293.cs> <4CE5838D.8000908@stpeter.im> Message-ID: On Thu, 18 Nov 2010, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > BTW, over the summer I pinged Ian about potentially formalizing OTR at a > standards body (I think the IETF is the right place, but opinions might > differ). Now that I'm very close to finished with revisions to the base > XMPP specs, I could free up some time to help with that. I'd love to see > an RFC published about OTR so that we can further encourage more > implementations. I would definitely be interested in assisting with that. Paul From stpeter at stpeter.im Sat Dec 4 23:05:26 2010 From: stpeter at stpeter.im (Peter Saint-Andre) Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2010 21:05:26 -0700 Subject: [OTR-dev] New OTR Development In-Reply-To: References: <1290108243.4487.57.camel@scspc293.cs> <4CE5838D.8000908@stpeter.im> Message-ID: <4CFB0F86.2070808@stpeter.im> On 12/4/10 4:35 PM, Paul Wouters wrote: > On Thu, 18 Nov 2010, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > >> BTW, over the summer I pinged Ian about potentially formalizing OTR at a >> standards body (I think the IETF is the right place, but opinions might >> differ). Now that I'm very close to finished with revisions to the base >> XMPP specs, I could free up some time to help with that. I'd love to see >> an RFC published about OTR so that we can further encourage more >> implementations. > > I would definitely be interested in assisting with that. Excellent. I talked with a few security area folks at IETF 79 in Beijing last month and they thought an Informational RFC about OTR would be a good first step. Paul, would you (and any other folks) like to chat about this in the next few weeks to explore what's involved? Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 6105 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature URL: From paul at cypherpunks.ca Thu Dec 9 16:16:22 2010 From: paul at cypherpunks.ca (Paul Wouters) Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 16:16:22 -0500 (EST) Subject: [OTR-dev] New OTR Development In-Reply-To: <4CFB0F86.2070808@stpeter.im> References: <1290108243.4487.57.camel@scspc293.cs> <4CE5838D.8000908@stpeter.im> <4CFB0F86.2070808@stpeter.im> Message-ID: On Sat, 4 Dec 2010, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > Excellent. I talked with a few security area folks at IETF 79 in Beijing > last month and they thought an Informational RFC about OTR would be a > good first step. > > Paul, would you (and any other folks) like to chat about this in the > next few weeks to explore what's involved? Sure. It will about a week and a half for me for things to wind down and I could give this some cycles. Paul From stpeter at stpeter.im Thu Dec 9 16:17:44 2010 From: stpeter at stpeter.im (Peter Saint-Andre) Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 14:17:44 -0700 Subject: [OTR-dev] New OTR Development In-Reply-To: References: <1290108243.4487.57.camel@scspc293.cs> <4CE5838D.8000908@stpeter.im> <4CFB0F86.2070808@stpeter.im> Message-ID: <4D014778.2070303@stpeter.im> On 12/9/10 2:16 PM, Paul Wouters wrote: > On Sat, 4 Dec 2010, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > >> Excellent. I talked with a few security area folks at IETF 79 in Beijing >> last month and they thought an Informational RFC about OTR would be a >> good first step. >> >> Paul, would you (and any other folks) like to chat about this in the >> next few weeks to explore what's involved? > > Sure. It will about a week and a half for me for things to wind down and > I could give this some cycles. Same here. I'm off from December 23 to January 2, so perhaps we should plan for early January? Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 6105 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature URL: